In everyday life we can handle objects and glue them together. However on the nanoscale this is hard. As nanodevices are small, we often need a lot of them (billions) to accomplish a task. Even when we can handle objects with enough precision it is not sensible to build nanodevices one by one. We need to design ways for them to build themselves.
Having packaged the nano-components the next step is to put them together in a controlled way. But what about the assembly do we want to control? My research focusses on gold nanoparticles. These are fascinating because they manipulate light on the nanoscale. The electric field of light bounces the the electrons in the gold back and forth. Those electrons then generate their own electric field in a way that effectively focuses the light. This can be used to detect substances (drugs, pollutants, explosives) at low concentrations. If the structure is made just right even individual molecules can be detected.
For this application the crucial parameters are the spacing between nanoparticle units and where the molecules are placed. The nanoparticles need to be extremely close, but not touching, and the molecules need to sit in the gap in between. The overall structure (chains, branches...) is not so important.
We control these aspects of the nanoassembly using cucurbit[n]uril. This molecule glues the nanoparticles together which at the same time defines the particle spacing to be one cucurbit[n]uril-width wide. In addition, cucurbit[n]uril has a cavity that can capture the molecule to be sensed. As the cucurbit[n]uril defines the gap this puts the trapped molecule in exactly the right place to be detected. Therefore all the important aspects of the assembly are elegantly controlled.
However, some core questions are yet to be answered and this is the focus of my work. How does the sensing behave during the nanoparticle assembly? Is there an ideal assembly size? What makes the cucurbit[n]uril glue sticky? Can we sense real analytes, e.g. biomaterials produced by microalgae?